Setiap Artikel Malaysiawaves ke Email Anda.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dipersilakan untuk Like Facebook Page T. Besi

Search Malaysiawaves

Friday, December 26, 2008

MCA Trying to Capitalize on Hudud Issue Out of Desperation

MCA is really going to town on the Hudud issue. Funny, we never saw MCA doing the same thing during the various body snatching incidences?

For the life of me, why is MCA not questioning other Islamic practices in Malaysia, if they are so much in opposition to Hudud?

It seems they are really out to create feelings of uneasiness among the Pakatan Rakyat component parties. After their massive rejection during the 2008 elections, they are desperate to gain relevance yet again.

Trying to appeal to the fears of the non muslim community in Malaysia is the only thing MCA is capable is doing to save themselves.

Where Was MCA?

There were other inter-religous issue occuring before this courtesy of UMNO. Where was MCA then?

Where was MCA during the body snatching incidences? Where was MCA when UMNO made statements with regards to the status of non Malays in Malaysia?

Where were they? Why didn't they come down and demonstrate then? Is it because they agreed to UMNO's stand on Malay supremacy?

Hudud is a Non Issue

Again, let me remind all that Hudud is a non issue. For one, it will only be applied to MUSLIMS and therefore ALL NON MUSLIMS will be exempted.

Second, to deny Hudud is to deny Muslims from practicing their own religion. This is because Hudud and Qisas is part of Islam just like prayers and fasting.

If MCA claims to believe in freedom of religion, why do they resist the implementation of hudud? When prevented, Muslims are unable to practice their religion in totality. Is that a sign of MCA's support for freedom of religion?

MCA Wants Muslims To Continue With British COlonial Legacy

My other question to MCA is: does MCA wishes to prolonged the British colonial policy of the replacement of Islamic laws with common law, which was imposed upon Muslims in Malaysia during the British occupation of Malaya?

MCA must be made aware that the law of this land is hudud before the coming of British. In fact, the Chinese in Melaka, Kelantan, Terengganu was all living under hudud law long before the British came.

MCA's sudden resistance to hudud is a sign that they are nothing but a British lackey committed to continue British legacy in Malaysia.

At the end of the day, Muslims only want what is rightfully theirs, to practice their religion in totality.

Is that too much to ask?

Tulang Besi



11 comments:

Ti Lian Ker said...

It is wrong to allay the fears of Non-Muslims by saying that the Hudud Law is not applicable to Non-Muslims. There will be conflict of laws in actual implementation like the conflict between civil and syariah laws in the case of a conversion by one of the spouse to Muslim. Which law is applicable.
Similarly we foresee a situation whereby Muslims commit an act of rape on a Non-Muslim and we cannot convict the rapist under Hudud law due to non-fulfilment of Islamic penal criteria. Under the criminal law, he could have been convicted but under Hudud, we can't convict him...so???? What about evidential laws? Is DNA applicable and sufficient proof....We are talkinf of justice and it's far reaching implication on our multi-racial society.
Many answers need to be answered and many questions are unanswered.
Until and unless we clear the issues and discuss the conflicts of law etc etc....we are not ready for Hudud law! It may lead to greater man made injusrices.
With due respect to my fellow Muslims. I am talking of law and not Islam here. Don't politicize this discussion into an us against them situation. We are encroaching into the administration of justices where layman may not be qualified to make a decision. This discussion requires leaga expertise.

Faizal Zakaria's Blog said...

PAS kena beri penerangan :-)















(( Renungkan )) Ke Mana Kita Mahu Pergi?
http://TeamPemudaUMNO.blogspot.com
Forum Generasi Muda
http://Forum1Malaysia.blogspot.com
Pakatan Antara Parti Lawan Tidak Kekal
http://pro-faizal.blogspot.com

Anonymous said...

wazzup wit muzik?
haram atau tidak?

can u jelaskan sikit?

aint no talkin muslim/non muslim
wanna kno when an if
its gonna be banned

an why. that would be a good start to youre answer that is so hard to get from u

Tulang Besi said...

Conversion: Islamic law applies to the half that converted to Islam,

Have u ever seen non muslims being subjected to Islamic Family Law?

Rape: it is never applied under Hudud, but rather taa'zeer. In the case of Malaysia, both Muslim and Non Muslim subject to Civil court.

DNA: It is not as solid as 4 credible witnesses. Why? Because DNA still requires the forensic pathologist or the chemistry expert to come and testify.

at the end of the day, we rely on the words of the expert testimony because we have no way of determining if the expert witness is telling the truth or not?

I'd go for 4 witnesses anytime.

I think the issues are very clear until now.

Tulang Besi said...

As for Music, there is a fatwa saying it is not haram.

Concerts on the hand is a different animal altogether.

Tulang Besi said...

All the issues raised about Hudud laws thus far is nothing but speculation or conjectures by liberals who do not like secularism being compromised.

Anonymous said...

"All the issues raised about Hudud laws thus far is nothing but speculation or conjectures by liberals who do not like secularism being compromised."

Betui..mereka ni otak dungu mat salleh celup..yalah..by election tak lama lagi..spin doktor dah mulakan permainan gasing..

Anonymous said...

where can i find the fatwa on music you refer to?

Serious Shepherd said...

For once I do not want to see the non-Malays who came to Tanah Melayu in the 19th and 20th century as 'pendatang'.

At the same time, I do not want to see them as 'penjajah' for insisting on maintaining the legacy of the British Empire rather than supporting the return of laws implemented before the first British set their foot on Tanah Melayu and began imposing their laws without conducting any referendum whatsoever.

Or do the Chinese need their own version of Nurul Huda Abdul Ghani, Nurin Jazlin Jazimin, Sharlinie Mohd Nasar etc?

Anonymous said...

Civil Law - beyond reasonable doubt.

Hudud Law - beyond the shadow of reasonable doubt. Hudud is more detail. Hudud is only for Muslims, that simple.

Anonymous said...

Aiyah,
The looming election going in KT. Stick to the election campaign.
As for the Hudud. I repeated many times. If it encroches the Malaysian constuition. I am sorry. Stick to it. Anyway, we should fight to revert to the original constuition.
Saya tak faham. Mengapa orang Indonesia? 90% muslim masih berpegang kepada prinsip pancasila. Pancasila itu secular.

Aiyah,
If I were to be born earlier, I would have welcome Soerkarno open arms and legs. Indonesians especially muslims are better. More open! You can choose your religion

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

ARiF merupakan jentera utama Harapan Baru di dalam membantu kelancaran gerakerja semua peringkat.

Kami ARiF Melaka memerlukan sumbangan dan bantuan kewangan daripada tuanpuan untuk kami melakukan gerakerja berkenaan. Oleh kerana kami masih baru, sumbangan diperlukan untuk menampung kos pakaian, membeli peralatan komunikasi, peralatan lalulintas dan sebagainya.

Kami amat berbebsar hati jika tuan/puan dapat menghulurkan sumangan kepada kami. Segala sumbangan diserahkan kepada pemegang amanah ARiF Melaka.

MOHD AZWAN AHMAD
a/k Maybank : 104013154427

Hantarkan makluman bank-in melalui SMS/WA ke 016-981 1315 (H.ANUAR)

Semuga Allah membalas segala jasa baik tuan/puan semua.