Setiap Artikel Malaysiawaves ke Email Anda.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Dipersilakan untuk Like Facebook Page T. Besi

Search Malaysiawaves

Wednesday, May 4, 2011

Eskay Tak Ingat Samada Jam Omega Ada Dalam Video

NOTA EDITOR: Dulu bukan main bising pasal jam. Blogger2 Najib semuanya mencabar Anwar menunjukkan jam kepada umum. Sekarang ini Eskay kata dia tak pasti jam tu ada dalam video atau tidak

Dengan kata lain, dia tidak pasti jam itu wujud atau tidak di tempat dan masa video blue Rahim Thamby Chik dirakam.


Shazryl not sure if Omega watch in sex video
By Clara Chooi
May 04, 2011


Shazryl said his DNA may have been taken for comparison with samples from the watch. — file pic
KEPONG, May 4 — Businessman Datuk Shazryl Eskay Abdullah admitted today he had not observed if the Omega watch purportedly belonging to Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim had been filmed in the controversial sex video he released in March.

Shazryl said this when claiming to reporters today that his DNA sample had likely been taken recently to compare with that found on the watch.

“I do not know, I did not observe those things,” he said, when asked if the Omega watch could be seen in the 21-minute video.

Shazryl had earlier insisted that the watch belonged to Anwar, claiming the opposition leader had left it behind in the room where the videoed sex acts had taken place.

He made the claim when screening the video for the first time to journalists at the Carcosa Seri Negara hotel here on March 21.

Shazryl, who at the time had only identified himself as “Datuk T”, said after the sex act, the woman in the video had fished out the watch from Anwar’s belongings while the latter had gone to the bathroom.

He also alleged that Anwar had then instructed the person, whom Shazryl claimed found the video, to return to the hotel room to retrieve the watch.

During the screening, “Datuk T” had also showed an Omega watch to reporters, claiming that it was the watch that had been reclaimed by his group of accomplices.

Since then, Anwar, his wife, and his comrades in PKR have refused to field questions on the watch or produce his own Omega watch to deflect the accusations.

Shazryl and his two other accomplices, Tan Sri Abdul Rahim Tamby Chik and Datuk Shuib Lazim, collectively “Datuk T”, have since surrendered both the video and the watch to the police.

When asked today why the police had taken his DNA sample recently, Shazryl said, “I think in that case, it has something to do with the watch. I was holding on to the watch so there must have been some DNA exposure.”

Shazryl also claimed today that the original clip had not been filmed in Thailand as claimed by some.

He acknowledged there were Thai subtitles emblazoned across the bottom of the screen in the leaked video version.

“I never made that video with the Thai writing.

“But I can confirm that the original video was made in Malaysia. Who did the Thai one, I do not know.

“There was no writing in the original clip, you could only see the dates... But for some reason, whoever who published that (the Thai clip), it had some Thai words for an apparent reason that they know best,” he said.

Shazryl was earlier summoned to have his statement recorded on the fracas that took place at the Masjid Amru Al-As mosque last Friday, where he took an oath of innocence on Allah’s name over the controversy.

He told reporters that he had been quizzed on the events that took place but offered no further details.

Shazryl had invited Anwar to join him during the oath-taking but the latter had ignored the challenge.

He also reiterated his willingness to take a polygraph test to prove that he was not lying over the video but insisted on two conditions — that Anwar takes the test first and that the tests be broadcast live.

“I feel no sense of dread for I have nothing to hide.

“It must be fair, it must be live so there will be no claims of conspiracy,” he said.

Shazryl added that he had never once accused Anwar of committing adultery but merely wanted the leader to admit that he was the man in the video.

“I merely asked — is this him? I went to reporters because you know him best,” he said.

11 comments:

Anonymous said...

Aiyoo! sudah tukar ka? nyuuh! nyuh!

Anonymous said...

ni semua keja manusia keparat...haritu sumpah bukan main lagi, arini da tukar statement lak..

nk tgk ape puak2 umporno nak ulas...sudah la...puak2 jahanam ni...

Anonymous said...

Ha ha. Is that all the best you can do? Questioning whether a small omega watch was filmed in a 22 min sex video? Does it make a difference? The fact that Anwar has an omega watch. He admitted it when he said it was stolen. Then he said it was with his wife. But after more than 1 month, he still cannot produce it. Is it really that hard to produce an omega watch?

You go to do better than that TB.

juba said...

apa lagi nak di tunggu ... anwar saman jelah eskay. pasti boleh menang punya.

Anonymous said...

ingat AllAH = Beriman

ingat ESKAY = ingat UMNO

ingat UMNO = aik ingat SEX la pulak

lleekh said...

It does not add up!
1.How did he get the video? Since it was a hidden camera in a room, the owner/worker/person who set it up in the hotel would have removed the video when the parties left the hotel.
2.How come the police did not get any confirmation of the ownership of the video or/and video equipment from the manager of the hotel?
3.If the video was from the hotel, how would Eskay know where it was made or where it was not made?
4.Since he was the only 1 having the video, then the releases of the video all over the place must be due to his negligence. He should be able to tell the police who else gain control of the video long enough for copies to be made.
5.Why did the sex worker not take away the watch after fishing for it? Did he recover the watch from the room or from the woman? The woman must have been senseless leaving the watch behind after getting it. The only way he could claimed to have discovered the video was by going back to the room. The watch was the excuse and the woman was stupid! Of course it did not occur to him to go look for the woman.
6.Every "quicky" hotel would have somebody clean the room when the occupants have left. SO any item left behind would have been found by the cleaners. How convenient the room was left uncleaned.
7.If you want to go to a room, the hotel would normally send somebody up to open the door for you. HOw convenient that Eskay was allowed to go to the room unaccompanied.
8.Did the police ask ESkay how many trips he made to the hotel on that day?
9.Was there a security camera in the hotel to record the coming and goings in the hotel?
The police are very smart in their investigations. They have suddenly become very stupid!! How to believe?

Anonymous said...

Hahaha..

why the sex worker dont songlap the watch?

exaccally ...bull shit

eskay better making a smart video with clear Anwar face..hahahahha

Anonymous said...

pas bila nak buat solat hajat lagi???? kali ni pasti ramai akan datang...

Anonymous said...

Yang terlalu menyedihkan umat Islam kejadian yang berlaku di sebuah sekolah agama di Arau, Sekolah ini juga dimiliki sepenuhnya sebuah parti yang kononnya 100% Islam dari Islam. Rakyat Malaysia terutamanya umat Islam cukup kecewa dengan tragedi ini. Lebih-lebih lagi suspek, adalah merupakan tenaga pengajar sekolah agama yang bergelar ustaz pulak tu.




Mangsa, Saiful Syazani Saiful Sopfidee, ada kesan melecet di tangannya kesan akibat diikat dan didera dengan begitu teruk, mangsa juga dikatakan diikat di tingkap sekolah agama berasrama tersebut sebelum dibelasah gurunya yang berusia 26 tahun, atas sebab kesalahan mencuri RM 7.
Pelajar tersebut, yang dibelasah hampir 2 jam pengsan selepas kejadian akibat kecederaan di kepala dan tubuh badan akibat dipukul bertubi-tubi, dan tangisan serta rayuan mangsa tidak diendahkan.Dan yang paling tragis, ini adalah kali kedua mangsa dipukul oleh suspek atas disyaki mencuri.
Dalam hal ini pemimpin Pas dilihat membisu langsung tidak ada apa-apa kenyataan daripada mereka. pemimpin Pas lebih sibuk mempertahankan video seks Anwar Ibrahim sehingga lupa pembunuhan yang berlaku terhadap kana-kanak berumur 7 tahun.

Anonymous said...

Inilah mentaliti Parti Anjur Seks(PASrael).Dok sibuk pasal jam. Agaknya pasal jamban kot sebab PASrael dipimpin oleh wali selipar jamban. Dok tengah cari selipar nak pi jamban la tu.

Anonymous said...

Sumpah penghakiman hendaklah diberikan dengan perintah hakim atau wakilnya untuk menyelesaikan kes berdasarkan kehendak hakim, demikian pendapat jumhur fuqaha’.

Hak-hak Yang Tidak Dapat Disabitkan dengan Sumpah dan Yang Dapat Disabitkan dengan Sumpah

Fuqaha’ sepakat berpendapat bahawa tidak diharuskan bersumpah dalam perkara-perkara yang berkaitan dengan pensabitan Hak Allah semata-mata sama ada ia kesalahan Hudud seperti zina, mencuri, minum minuman yang memabukkan atau yang berkaitan dengan ibadah semata-mata seperti solat, puasa, haji, sedekah, nazar dan kaffarah, melainkan jika ia ada melibatkan hak manusia, kerana hudud tertolak apabila ada kesamaran bukti.

Fuqaha’ juga sepakat berpendapat bahawa diharuskan sumpah dalam perkara-perkara yang berkaitan dengan harta dan seumpamanya. Pihak yang didakwa diberi hak bersumpah untuk memperakukan dakwaannya atau menafikannya. Demikian juga, fuqaha’ sepakat berpendapat bahawa diharuskan bersumpah dalam perkara jenayah, melibatkan kesalahan qisas dan kecederaan termasuk juga sebahagian daripada perkara-perkara yang berkaitan dengan kekeluargaan.

Tuduhan zina antara suami isteri lebih kepada mencabuli keselamatan dan kesejahteraan rumah tangga yang lebih bersifat hak peribadi manusia daripada hak Allah kerana penglibatan tuduhan itu berlaku dalam keluarga tidak melibatkan masyarakat awam, tidak sebagaimana yang berlaku ke atas bukan keluarga.

Oleh itu bagi mensabitkan jenayah Qazaf yang berlaku antara suami isteri hendaklah pihak yang menuduh membuktikan tuduhan ke atas isterinya berzina, sekali pun didubur dengan bersumpah menyebut nama Allah, Wallahi, Wabillahi atau Watallahi sebanyak empat kali bahawa isterinya melakukan zina dan kali kelima hendaklah ia bersumpah dengan nama Allah jika ia berdusta maka laknat Allah ke atas dirinya.

Bagi isterinya jika ia menyangkal dakwaan suaminya hendaklah ia bersumpah dengan menyebut nama Allah, Wallahi, Wabillahi, atau Watallahi, sebanyak empat kali bahawa dia tidak melakukan zina yang didakwanya, dan kali kelima ia bersumpah jika ia berdusta maka ia dilaknat oleh Allah S.W.T. Ini berdasarkan kepada Firman Allah S.W.T. yang bermaksud:

“Dan orang-orang yang menuduh isteri mereka (berzina) tidak mempunyai saksi-saksi selain diri mereka sendiri, maka persaksian orang itu ialah empat kali bersumpah dengan nama Allah sesungguhnya dia adalah termasuk orang-orang yang benar (an-Nur: 6). Dan sumpah yang kelima bahawa laknat Allah ke atasnya jika ia termasuk orang-orang yang berdusta (an-Nur: 7).

Isterinya itu dihindarkan daripada hukuman oleh sumpahnya empat kali atas nama Allah bahawa sesungguhnya suaminya itu benar-benar termasuk orang-orang yang dusta (an-Nur: 8).

Dan sumpah yang kelima bahawa laknat Allah atasnya jika suaminya itu termasuk orang-orang yang benar (al-Nur: 9).

Dengan sumpah ini menjadikan mereka berdua terpisah dan gugur ke atas suami hukuman Qazaf dan gugur atas isteri hukuman had zina.

Memandangkan jenayah Qazaf ini sebagai suatu jenayah yang serius dan terdapat nas qat’iy tentang ketetapan kesalahan, prosedur pembuktian dan hukuman keseksaannya, kerana ia diketegorikan sebagai kesalahan awam, maka sumpah tidak termasuk dalam prosedur pembuktian jenayah Hudud, kecuali dalam kes yang melibatkan tuduhan zina antara suami dengan isteri yang tidak diketegorikan sebagai kesalahan awam.

Kerana ia lebih kepada kesalahan peribadi dan kekeluargaan, maka ia sebagai kes pengecualian maka pihak yang membuat dakwaan diminta bersumpah laknat dengan nama Allah demikian juga pihak yang engkar dakwaan itu diminta bersumpah laknat dengan nama Allah.

Berdasarkan pandangan jumhur fuqaha’ bahawa kesalahan jenayah Hudud tidak termasuk dalam perkara yang boleh menggunakan sumpah untuk mensabitkan atau menafikannya kecuali pada masalah li’an, tuduhan zina yang melibatkan suami isteri yang diperuntukkan khusus dalam al-Qur’an sebagai pengecualian daripada prosedur umum pensabitan zina dan Qazaf.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

ARiF merupakan jentera utama Harapan Baru di dalam membantu kelancaran gerakerja semua peringkat.

Kami ARiF Melaka memerlukan sumbangan dan bantuan kewangan daripada tuanpuan untuk kami melakukan gerakerja berkenaan. Oleh kerana kami masih baru, sumbangan diperlukan untuk menampung kos pakaian, membeli peralatan komunikasi, peralatan lalulintas dan sebagainya.

Kami amat berbebsar hati jika tuan/puan dapat menghulurkan sumangan kepada kami. Segala sumbangan diserahkan kepada pemegang amanah ARiF Melaka.

MOHD AZWAN AHMAD
a/k Maybank : 104013154427

Hantarkan makluman bank-in melalui SMS/WA ke 016-981 1315 (H.ANUAR)

Semuga Allah membalas segala jasa baik tuan/puan semua.